Juvelook Undereye Filler Leads · Case study
3,200+ Juvelook Undereye Filler Leads at an $8.92 Cost Per Lead
- medical aesthetics
- Singapore
- 2025
-
3,246
Juvelook leads across 44 campaigns
-
$8.92
blended cost per lead
85% below the ~$61 comparison benchmark used in the source reporting
-
18 months
without creative fatigue
$5.86 CPA in month 1 · $6.06 CPA in month 18
Meta lead generation · $28,947 managed ad spend · June 2024 to December 2025
01
The Brief
Turn one high-intent, high-value treatment into a dependable lead channel for a luxury medical aesthetics clinic in Singapore.
Juvelook undereye filler had to keep converting long after the launch window. That meant solving the problem that usually weakens a single-treatment campaign: audiences see the same promise repeatedly, creative response falls, and acquisition costs start climbing.
The campaign also had to work within Singapore’s healthcare advertising restrictions. Performance could not depend on before-and-after imagery, guaranteed outcomes, or aggressive promotional hooks.
02
The Method
Rotate the Angle, Not the Treatment
The treatment stayed constant while the creative system kept changing around it. New creators, fresh hooks, and monthly creative refreshes approached the same patient concerns from different directions without changing the underlying offer.
That made creative variety part of the operating system rather than a rescue tactic. Each cycle supplied a new way into the decision while the campaign history, treatment recognition, and conversion learning continued to compound.
Month One Established the Baseline
The June 2024 launch campaign delivered a $5.86 cost per acquisition and a 6.94% click-through rate. It proved that the combination of education-led creative and paid distribution could generate efficient demand for the treatment.
Month Eighteen Proved Durability
In December 2025, the same treatment was still converting at a $6.06 CPA with a 14.55% conversion rate. Acquisition cost had moved by only $0.20 from the launch campaign, while the final-month conversion rate was stronger.
Individual campaigns reached conversion rates as high as 24.73%, nearly five times the approximately 5% comparison baseline used in the source reporting.
03
Results
Across 18 months, the Juvelook undereye filler system produced:
- 3,246 leads across 44 campaigns
- $8.92 blended cost per lead across $28,947 in managed ad spend
- $5.86 CPA in month 1 and $6.06 in month 18, showing virtually no cost inflation
- Up to 24.73% conversion rate at peak campaign efficiency
The important result is not one unusually cheap campaign. It is the ability to keep one treatment producing predictable lead flow across 44 campaigns and 18 months without letting creative fatigue take control of the economics.
For clinics that carry Juvelook, or need a stronger undereye filler marketing system, the case shows what happens when creative renewal, distribution, and paid-media learning operate as one continuous process. US med spas can see how we scope the same system on our med spa advertising and content page.
STOP POSTING AND HOPING.
30 minutes with Angelica to talk through your content, find the main bottleneck, and see if we are the right team to help.
- 1 We look at what you post now
- 2 We name the bottleneck
- 3 We tell you straight if we fit
30 minutes. For brands investing in content or ads.